Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia (country)–Pakistan relations
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:57, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Georgia (country)–Pakistan relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Entire article is a copyvio, and there is no indication that relations between these countries are notable. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 22:53, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 22:53, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Egad! The entire article? All 1 sentences of it? Are you sure you've checked the whole thing? Honestly, this seems like you're making a mountain out of a molehill. Jinkinson talk to me 23:08, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Copyvio aside, there is no indication of notability for relations between these countries other than WP:ITEXISTS. I only mentioned the copyvio because the editor that created this article was banned for creating a series of articles like this one that were copied and pasted from other websites. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 23:32, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Copyvio aside, there is no indication of notability for relations between these countries other than WP:ITEXISTS. I only mentioned the copyvio because the editor that created this article was banned for creating a series of articles like this one that were copied and pasted from other websites. --Ahecht (TALK
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete in its current state; a mere statement of existence is not sufficient for an article. If someone manages to add some reliably referenced text then I'm happy to retract my !vote. —Psychonaut (talk) 06:00, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.