Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gmmco Ltd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to CK Birla Group. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 00:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gmmco Ltd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subsidiary company. Seem to to be a target for continual promotion and advertising. Possible merge to main company. scope_creep (talk) 11:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect / merge per WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:PROMO. — fortunavelut luna 12:25, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to CK Birla Group: The passing mention of this subsidiary and its line of business on the page about the parent firm is already sufficient. No evidence that it has notability in its own right. AllyD (talk) 12:45, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to CK Birla Group & protect from recreation; too much SPA activity. There's nothing to merge as the article does not cite suitable sources, nor could I find significant coverage when I PROD'ed the article just recently. PROD was removed be an employee of the company; pls see disclosure here: [1]. Better off without this page or future attempts at recreation. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:57, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.