Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Peckham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hannah Peckham

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional stub for a non-notable tv presenter. The sole reference for this article is nowhere near being a WP:RS; Google search turns of nothing of any value, mostly just resumes, Wikipedia mirrors and other people with the same name. PC78 (talk) 18:52, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable TV presenter.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:51, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete. When a UK media-BLP throws up virtually no RS in any UK media (even 2nd tier papers), it is a strong fail. Britishfinance (talk) 18:14, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.