Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Cardwell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 00:57, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Cardwell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL JMHamo (talk) 00:38, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 00:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - passes GNG - coverage in a (Scottish) national newspaper that is not trivial and goes into significant depth, talking about his (youth) career to date and family [1]. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 06:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Agree that the above source is a lengthy article on the player, but that is the only source I could find during a quick google search that could be deemed significant enough to support GNG. Everything else is just routine transfer talk. Fenix down (talk) 10:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. One decent article is not "significant" coverage, I'm afraid. Giant Snowman 18:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nfooty is well established - 1 top tier appearance, just 1 minute on the field is enough. Szzuk (talk) 22:03, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.