Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Evans
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep by clear consensus. --Kind Regards - Heligoland 03:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral bump up from A7 speedy. Assertion to notability is on talk page. No opinion. Kchase T 20:54, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep - manager of a professional football club, coaching them to their only league trophy to date. Easily satisfies WP:BIO under the professional sportsperson guideline. Qwghlm 21:00, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep clearly a notable figure in Blackpool history. References in order. Sam Vimes | Address me 21:01, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, Managed at the highest level in English football. Oldelpaso 21:35, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:BIO. Mkdwtalk 21:37, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strongest possible Keep as per all above. Why on earth was this article ever listed for speedy deletion? Wikipedia needs more articles about players/managers from this era, not deletions.Daemonic Kangaroo 22:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep any league manager is notable enough. ArtVandelay13 00:34, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep a manager of a professional league football team, and more than that, one of the most notable figures in the history of this particular football team Robotforaday 01:36, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Looking at the circumstances surrounding this nomination, it seems quite possible that the initial speedy tag which led to this afd was not in good faith. Robotforaday 01:41, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Noteable as manager of very noteable team. There is a whole list of managers for this team with pages for all of them so that backs up that afd was not in good faith considering no reason was given.--155.144.251.120 02:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep per WP:SNOW. BlueValour 03:31, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Speedy deletion not in good faith. --Park70 03:35, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.