Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayley-Marie Coppin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:08, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hayley-Marie Coppin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable glamour model - the sources in the article (bar this one) are all 2-bit mentions,

The sources on Google News are even worse (NSFW):

"Hayley-Marie Coppin mostró todas sus partes íntimas". (Translates as: Hayley-Marie Coppin showed all her private parts)
"Halyey-Marie Coppin, totalmente desnuda en la playa". (Translates as: Halyey-Marie Coppin, totally naked on the beach)
"Hayley Marie Coppin - chân dài bốc lửa cuồng West Ham". (Translates as: Hayley Marie Coppin - West Ham's fiery long legs)
"Hayley-Marie Coppin, su topless más sensual en el agua". (Translates as: Hayley-Marie Coppin, her most sensual topless in the water)
"El desnudo total de Hayley-Marie Coppin". (Translates as: The total nude of Hayley-Marie Coppin)
"Hayley Marie Coppin se animó a mostrar de más". (Translates as: Hayley Marie Coppin was encouraged to show more)

Source 3 has been copied from the Wikipedia article and the rest are galleries of her naked .... Fails MODEL and GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 15:46, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:51, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:51, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:51, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable model.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:59, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:ENT; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:26, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.