Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haynes Aero Skyblazer (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Haynes Aero Skyblazer

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Category indicates it is an abandoned project so doesn't have any expectation of gaining any notability. Fails WP:GNG. Additionally, article was created by the creator of the topic. Perhaps a merger into another article to fulfill WP:ATD. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:51, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Transportation. UtherSRG (talk) 11:51, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:30, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete Wikipedia is not a host for individual project's pages. It junk at best. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 08:10, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:19, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Zero coverage of any sort, only some hit on a Russian website, which looks sketchy to begin with. Nothing in Gnews or newspapers. Oaktree b (talk) 02:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The CNN Money piece used for sourcing is literally an image caption; the second deletion discussion proposes that there were sources that exited at the time in 2013 (the first one was for a Gsearch which now gives a 404, the second links to the Deseret News site, but the article in question is gone). I'd revisit if we had something more than the Deseret News source (assuming it's even extensive coverage), but I can't find anything. Oaktree b (talk) 02:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.