Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Fernández Molina
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Strong consensus that he failes the relevant notability guideline ~ mazca talk 23:50, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Hugo Fernández Molina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a football player who has not played in a fully-professional league or represented his country at senior level, as we can see here, also does not meet the general notability guideline. C679 08:12, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C679 08:13, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 17:58, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Page fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.Debojyoti (talk) 13:43, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Alexf(talk) 16:33, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - has not played in a fully pro league or represented his country at senior level, failing WP:NFOOTY. Also fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in reliable sources. Mentoz86 (talk) 04:38, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.