Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hurstville–Strathfield railway line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Proposed railways in Sydney. Randykitty (talk) 10:29, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hurstville–Strathfield railway line

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think it meets Wikipedia's notability standards for transportation and places. It's only reference is also void. TheRealWeatherMan (talk) 23:31, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:28, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:28, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:28, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep As long as better sourcing could be added.TH1980 (talk) 04:35, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Proposed railways in Sydney -- Whats new?^(talk) 10:24, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Proposed railways in Sydney. A defunct proposal. Not much more to be found than already in the article, but there are some IRS to be had. Not notable in its own right. Does deserve to have its own entry in Proposed railways in Sydney, and it is a likely search term. Aoziwe (talk) 10:57, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.