Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IBZ Recordings
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 18:56, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- IBZ Recordings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsupported claims of notability, possibly failing notability guidelines. Failed to find sources in a Google search. Suspected advertising attempt. Lakokat 08:22, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete under WP:CSD - Unambiguous advertising or promotion. Lugnuts (talk) 08:34, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no assertion of notability made and unsourced. Daniel Case (talk) 16:41, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Article reads like an advert, nothing to back up claims of notability, almost all links on the first five pages of Google go to pages set up by the company. Total-MAdMaN (talk) 18:32, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: as it is now, the article is promotional and fails the notability guidelines.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:43, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.