Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/INVEA-TECH (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. slakr^\ talk / 06:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

INVEA-TECH

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted via AFD; I am bringing this here for procedural reasons after removing an incorrectly placed PROD. While it is sufficiently different to not qualify for WP:CSD#G4, I have no opinion on this article's notability and I am neutral. Giant Snowman 20:39, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking in depth coverage in independent third party sources as required by the WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:54, 11 March 2014 (UTC) (as PROD'er)[reply]
Delete - After taking a step back and deciding to look at this again with the presumption of notability, I still am unable to find any reliable third party sources that indicate notability. I think it sounds like an interesting company that could, one day, be notable. Just don't think it's there yet, and unfortunately the article reads to me like an advertisement. C1776M ^Talk 12:18, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Hello gentlemen. Since I am an IT magazine publisher from Slovakia and I am really proud of our brothers (Czechs) having company like this, (recognized by Gartner, Cisco, Deloitte and known around the world) I was really missing an article about them in this encyclopedia, especially because US companies from the same R&D and business area like Lancope, Plixer, Appneta have theirs. I tried to use mentioned articles as a little guide how to write about INVEA-TECH. There are few third party references used, many of them I could provide in Czech, Slovak, Polish, German, Russian, and other languages, should I? I wanted to write this article in English because this language is an IT universal language, so it would be usefull for people all over the world interested in this company. Therefore, I would like you to keep this article, and maybe help me with changes, since it is my first article, and I am willing to write more right after I will get the principles. Thank you! Idavac (talk) 21:20, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:CORP as a non-notable company. JMHamo (talk) 21:32, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
PS: I have not found more English language reliable references for now except those, I have included. And Mr. JMHamo I do disagree with you. If so, then many other articles should be erased, like those companies mentioned above, and since I know this specific area of IT Security, I think my opinion should be considered. Think about English language as an universal IT language. Idavac (talk) 21:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Idavac: - you can use any source (English language, German, Czech etc. etc.) as long as it is a reliable source. Giant Snowman 21:53, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Cloudz679: - I would not say so, those are just scans of printed media, and I have not found them published online... Idavac (talk) 22:42, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

this one appears not to establish notability and reads mainly as a press release. The PDFs hosted on the company's own website, self-published or not, are unable to be translated automatically so are of limited value to this discussion. To be honest I don't have the time to go through 20 other sources, per WP:BURDEN I suggest you make a case of why the company is notable using the references you have access to. C 679 11:14, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Cloudz679: - This one is written also in English on the second page: https://www.invea.com/data/articles/2007-09-interface1.pdf, and about the case, I can do it, but honestly, need to find a little more time for that too. And I dont know if this one is a press release or not, but you are right, it looks like one, but it is in a serious magazine, so I really do not know, I guess we should not include that one. Idavac (talk) 13:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.