Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Dieci Comandamenti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:19, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I Dieci Comandamenti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (books) requirement. " It was deprodded by }the creator with the following edit summary: "Internation critics and artists translated into other languages poems from this book and used poems to create lyrical songs. The book is adopted by a lot of national and international libraries as Cambr. University and quoted in indip. critical books". While I don't read Italian, the references seem to mention the book in passing, and I do not see any reviews. No reliable source has presented a review of it, nor does it seem to won any awards that would give it automatic notability. As I've suggested at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gli anni di Cristo majority if not all of the works of Menotti Lerro do not appear notable and should be merged to his biographical article before they are deleted as stand-alone articles failing notability. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How can I add the delete vote for his "books"Devbasdev (talk) 09:11, 27 May 2015 (UTC)?[reply]

Delete There are no third-party RS, and I can't find any for this book. It meets none of the criteria for books. It's already a stretch that the author has a WP page (which itself has limited RS). LaMona (talk) 18:13, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:58, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.