Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ida Daussy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:44, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ida Daussy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTE Simply being a broadcaster and a professor unfotunatley doesnt give notability. Amortias (T)(C) 11:27, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:27, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:28, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:28, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comment~~. A casual Google search yielded two non-trivial English-language hits at the Korea Times. ~~Not enough to pass GNG by themselves but additional RS coverage may be out there.~~ • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. With some further searching, I found enough RS coverage in English and French to satisfy WP:BASIC. She's apparently famous in South Korea. • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No pass of WP:Prof#1. Not much else. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:03, 12 May 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Keep. -- Kanghuitari (talk) 06:03, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

and your reason (apart from being the creator)? Xxanthippe (talk) 06:52, 12 May 2014 (UTC).[reply]

See article. she is notable. -- Kanghuitari (talk) 08:22, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 17:12, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 16:57, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Added three more English sources to the article which are entirely devoted to her, and additionally Naver News search in Korean finds 787 articles which mention her name in their headline. The Korea Herald describes her as a "household name" in South Korea. Clearly meets the "significant coverage in reliable sources" burden. quant18 (talk) 13:35, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The new sources make notability obvious even to those of us who don't read Korean. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:47, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.