Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/If-by-whiskey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Noah S. Sweat#The "whiskey speech". czar 22:11, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If-by-whiskey

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe this is adequately covered in the section in the original speaker's article, Noah S. Sweat. While the term has been covered in various secondary sources, it has never been done so in a context that is separate from the speaker or the speech in question. I think it falls afoul of WP:INHERITED. I'd propose a merge, but I think the topic is adequately covered in the parent article already. BrigadierG (talk) 21:51, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Noah S. Sweat. Though if there was more information to be added to this page in terms of its broader user of the same sort of logical fallacy, I could be in favor of keeping the page. BA Schuetze (talk) 14:32, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the relevant section of Noah S. Sweat. That article already contains the text under scrutiny, whose subject, as it happens, cannot claim independent notability of much significance. -The Gnome (talk) 11:20, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.