Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilga Kļaviņa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. With no prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Bryce (talk | contribs) 01:20, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ilga Kļaviņa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This chess player does not seem notable enough. She did not win a Latvian championship, she does not hold the title of grandmaster. SyG (talk) 17:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article is related to the article "Latvian Chess Championship", the chess player associated with the victory of Latvian chess championship or additional match for champion title. Please leave this article, because otherwise the article "Latvian Chess Championship" will be a link without the article. Ilga Kļaviņa lost additional match for Latvian chess champion title in 1968. She played fro Latvia in Soviet team chess championships.--Uldis s (talk) 08:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 12:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 10:26, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment No indication of wp:notability, The sources are not coverage of her. North8000 (talk) 11:45, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.