Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JForce
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:40, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- JForce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable. nothing establishes encyclopedia notability. Light2021 (talk) 06:56, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 08:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 08:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. internal software, which the company then decided to sell to outsiders. The articles i mostly details of its development within the company, which is of interest to those on the project but nothing else. It's basically an industry press release, without good external references for notability. DGG ( talk ) 14:20, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:23, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - doesn't seem to be much other than press releases covering this Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:55, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.