Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JLCX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:51, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JLCX

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous prod was removed without comment. Concern was that their is no evidence of notability and the article is unsourced. I concur - not notable Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no indication of notability, let alone very poorly written and without any references.--Rpclod (talk) 13:06, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Incomprehensible in its own right, but it appears to say that "JLCX" isn't an independent, functioning unit anymore anyway. Hithladaeus (talk) 16:28, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:41, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:41, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. JLCX is a reporting mark for J&L Consulting, a leasing company. Those can be notable, but I can't find much discussion of the company. Mackensen (talk) 22:33, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.