Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Marwood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Big Dom 16:51, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

James Marwood

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contest PROD, reason being was "Meets WP:FOOTY notability. Currently plays for a fully professional club (http://www.gateshead-fc.com/2809/bogie-hails-historic-day) at a national level of the league structure (Conference National)."

However, WP:NFOOTY states he has to play at a fully-professional level, which the Conference National is not as there are a handful of clubs that are still semi-professional and mentions nothing about being at a national level. Also fails WP:GNG due to a lack of significant media coverage, beyond the standard WP:NTEMP match reports and club website info. --Jimbo^[online] 15:34, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --Jimbo^[online] 15:36, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Conference National is not fully pro, and he fails WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:00, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 12:28, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable footballer. A shame really because it's a decent article, but he doesn't meet WP:NFOOTBALL and hasn't done enough to pass WP:GNG. Argyle 4 Life^talk 20:14, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.