Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janera Solomon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Janera Solomon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced WP:BLP of a person notable only as executive director of an individual theatre. As always, every executive director of every organization does not get an automatic inclusion freebie just for existing -- she would need to be sourced well enough to clear WP:GNG. But the sources here are all primary sources — her "staff" profile on the website of an organization she's directly affiliated with, a blog entry on the website of another community development organization, and a piece of media coverage she wrote about herself — which means that exactly none of them are notability-assisting sources at all. She needs to be the subject of media coverage written by somebody other than herself to pass GNG; a person does not get a Wikipedia article just because staff profiles and her own diary of her day technically verify that she exists. Bearcat (talk) 20:03, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:35, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:35, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:35, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete executive directors of theatres are almost never notable, clearly we would need multiple cases of reliable source coverage to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - concur with OP that executive directors aren't notable by virtue of being executive directors. There are a few mentions of her on the web, but not solid enough coverage to support keeping the article —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:50, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am not seeing sources that support notability; seems like a person doing her job well, but not a notable career.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:11, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.