Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenő Hódi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that it's merely promotional DGG ( talk ) 16:31, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jenő Hódi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is clearly a promo piece for the subject and his film school. Fails WP:NCREATIVE and WP:GNG Domdeparis (talk) 09:47, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 09:57, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 09:57, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 09:57, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Hello! Could you help me how to meet all the criterias for not deleting this page? For me it seems like everything is fine with it but I am a beginner on this page so I would really appreciate your help, since the guidelines do not seem to help me. In my point of view this is an information piece and not a promo piece, Jenő Hódi has his own imdb site as well where you can look up all his work. Thanks for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hodijeno (talk • contribs) 10:04, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Please read WP:GNG and also WP:CREATIVE that should help you. Also your user name is the same as the subject which points towards either an autobiographical user account or a conflict of interest; Both of these are strongly discouraged as it is almost impossible to write about a subject with a neutral point of view. this article is IMHO promotional and this is against Wikipedia policy as per WP:NOTSOAPBOX. Domdeparis (talk) 10:24, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert ^{let's talk about that} 06:32, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom - cannot find any secondary coverage, seems to be a personal page El Pharao (talk) 20:28, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.