Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennalyn Ponraj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. I 'm closing this as speedy delete, because there is no reasonable indication of significance, let alone of notability. The two arguments by fans are obviously irrelevant,, and if anything, confirm the lack of significance. DGG ( talk ) 23:57, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jennalyn Ponraj

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Artist fails WP:MUSICBIO/WP:GNG. The only references are primary sources which do not help establish notability. I can find no in-depth secondary coverage in reliable sources. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 00:07, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. 5 albert square (talk) 00:50, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I cannot find any coverage in reliable sources beyond the AllMusic discography. The page was thrice declined as a draft and then created in articlespace without addressing the notability issue. Huon (talk) 00:50, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nothing in the article suggests that WP:ENTERTAINER criteria is met. Perhaps too soon?--Rpclod (talk) 03:54, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nothing to suggest that this 14-year-old has made it to Wikpedia's notability criteria at WP:MUSICBIO - yet. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:16, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article - I've seen Jennalyn perform on two different occasions and was blown away. I looked her up after I saw her open with her band at 253 United The Conference and found this page. She doesn't have too many things on the web about her but she does play a lot of gigs. I'm going to try and find some reviews about her music and I think you'll find a lot more references when her EP comes out. I joined Wikipedia because I don't think this should be deleted. Lizzyrose21 (talk) 00:07, 11 June 2015 (UTC)— Lizzyrose21 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
KEEP ARTICLE I RUN A FAN PAGE FOR JENNALYN PONRAJ!! (WE'VE BEEN AROUND SINCE MAY 5TH FOLLOW US ON TWITTER!!) I TWEETED ABOUT IT TODAY:)Heyyouuuu (talk) 00:24, 11 June 2015 (UTC)— Heyyouuuu (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete for now as my searches found no good third-party sources aside from music websites (ReverbNation, etc.) and primary sources (crowdfund, social media, etc.). SwisterTwister talk 23:55, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.