Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/João Marcos Brandet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Per G3. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 12:39, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

João Marcos Brandet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite the absolute plenitude of refs, it is difficult to find any sense of any significance let alone notability. I can find nothing that gets close to WP:GNG. Sure he is bright and can produce endless papers that indicate that, but that just doesn't cut the mustard on Wikipedia. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 17:41, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This 17-yo may become notable in time, but I found no evidence to suggest that he is yet. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 17:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as a hoax. A quick review of several of his "published works" indicate that he is fond of copying text from the Swedish Wikipedia and publishing it under his own name. (Compare KÄRNFYSIK: RÖNTGENSTRÅLNING, FOTONSTRÅLNING, GAMMASTRÅLNING, URAN, PLUTONIUM OCH CESIUM to sv:Röntgenstrålning, or SVART HÅL to sv:Svart hål, as just a quick sampling.) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete It is a hoax. In addition to WikiDan's info, Brandet was still a student at Londrina State University in 2013. The article sets up a premise with actual refs in normal text. It then has a brief italicized quote with Brandet's wordpress "articles" as a ref. Bgwhite (talk) 05:43, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.