Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/João Paulo Nunes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:54, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

João Paulo Nunes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject has some coverage but I do not see substantial enough and multiple reliable sources that would help the subject to reach either WP:GNG or WP:BIO standard. We need sources, NOT by the subject, but about the subject. He has written in some blogs and delivered some lecture some where, but where is the coverage? Well, the present article appears a piece of self-advertisement/promotional-spam. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 16:51, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ///EuroCarGT 17:13, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ///EuroCarGT 17:14, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. ///EuroCarGT 17:14, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete According to WP:BIO, the sources like 1 , 2 do not show the reliablity. Apart from this, such sources can be considered as WP:SELFSOURCE , that can be only used for the information about subject, not as a reliable source for notability. Notability can only be judge by the coverage about the subject. Article doesn't even pass through WP:BLPSOURCES criteria. A.Minkowiski^{_Lets t@lk} 17:55, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 15:57, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 01:20, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.