Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe A. Hanson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ . Joyous! Noise! 03:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Joe A. Hanson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Sources in the article are 1) Primary by author, 2) Mention in diagram credits, 3) Primary by author. Before showed nothing from WP:IS, WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV that addresses the subject directly and indepth and there appear to be no reviews of their work. // Timothy :: talk 12:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Found no WP:RS WP:SIGCOV on this person. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO as said above. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:51, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Science, and Technology. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:33, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Without links or explanation for acronyms such as GNG, BIO, and SIGCOV, I cannot fully understand why this article fails to meet community norms. To make these criteria legible please define them or link to their definition. I trust that these criteria are important, but from this side of the fence, this comment is simply insider gate keeping. Average-cyanobacteria (talk) 18:37, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added links. // Timothy :: talk 18:56, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.