Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Allen (artist) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. So Why 09:02, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Allen (artist)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searching does not appear to find substantial coverage in reliable sources. This person thus fails WP:NARTIST, as tagged since January 2014, with a claim that this is a CV. The first AfD failed to achieve consensus for having only an argument by an IP user. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 02:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 04:18, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 04:18, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 04:18, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep The Guardian article shows that there's plenty out there--dig through the above find sources template a bit, and you'll see that the GNG is met. Jclemens (talk) 04:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:10, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:45, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:08, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm searching, all I can really find is that he was part of a group show in Derby in 2009, it produced a published catalogue (source #4). And he is discussed, briefly, in the article about magic in The Guardian mentioned above. This is just not enough to pass WP:ANYBIO.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:36, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I bleieve I was the IP editor and only voter on the last AfD. Looking again for sources, I found a few, which I added. Nothing spectacular, but enough to show that he does exist, and did have thes shows claimed, and was covered in multiple reliable sources. Perhaps the depth is not what it should be, but the quality of the venues, if you know them, might tip the scale. Failing those arguments, he does seem to have made a significant and sustained contribution to the crossover area of magic in art, which qualifies him for WP:ARTIST.104.163.142.4 (talk) 06:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.