Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan M. Busch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:47, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan M. Busch

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

small-town mayor. Not notable and does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. As with any local politician, he received coverage from the local press, but that's not enough to meet the guideline. Rusf10 (talk) 02:32, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 02:32, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 02:32, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Coverage is local, and Metuchen, New Jersey's population was only 13K (in 2010), so being its mayor confers no particular notability. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:14, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete contrary to what some editors have thought there is not a special exception that makes New Jersey mayors default notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:13, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unremarkable legal and political career. FWIW, the Diocese of Metuchen is quite large, but the city is smallish. Bearian (talk) 16:16, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Concede that the page should be parred back, but Busch is mentioned regularly in statewide and regional news outlets and qualifies as receiving "significant press coverage." Homerseditor (talk) 20:56, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hasn't garnered anything more than routine coverage and doesn't pass WP:NPOL. Best, GPL93 (talk) 00:09, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete coverage is local, fails WP:NPOL, we do not keep mayors of small towns unless they pass WP:GNG for other reasons (otherwise notable, or achieved notability over an area significantly larger than their town.) SportingFlyer T·C 07:21, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ Just in New Jersey, there are numerous other pages for mayors that are no more notable than Busch. Took me two minutes to find four: James M. Cahill, Thomas Lankey, J. Christian Bollwage, Mohammed Hameeduddin. Homerseditor (talk) 15:40, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Homerseditor, you've already voted above, so I've struck your second !vote, though your comments are still welcome - but please also see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Some of these may also need to be deleted. SportingFlyer T·C 17:03, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lankey and Bollwage preside over populations over 100K (the unofficial cutoff), while Hameeduddin is a pioneer of sorts. I've nominated Cahill for deletion (despite his 28 years in office, and counting) due to a lack of significant media coverage. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:22, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable fails wp:npol from a city of less than 15,000. Lightburst (talk) 23:49, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.