Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KMB Route 71B
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of bus routes in Hong Kong. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:27, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- KMB Route 71B (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Probably fails GNG, though the zhwiki article has two non-primary non-fansite possible RSes. I have not thoroughly looked for sources, but its only notable feature appears to be that it is very short and it is otherwise unremarkable. Jc86035 (talk) 16:33, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:N and WP:NOTTRAVEL (there is little to the article other than telling you where a bus route goes). This information probably belongs in a list. SportingFlyer (talk) 01:43, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:N and WP:NOTTRAVEL. No indication of being more than just another route.Charles (talk) 11:22, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- WP:N depends on the content and reliability of Chinese Wikipedia sources. WP:NOTTRAVEL isn't a valid reason for deletion here, as content is not like a travel guide and would not be suitable for one. Peter James (talk) 19:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Peter James (talk) 19:53, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Peter James (talk) 19:53, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of bus routes in Hong Kong. Bus routes are mostly non-notable, and a search only turned up bus fansites and KMB official information. zhwiki article's sources are mostly bus fansites as well. Thus fails GNG. R22-3877 (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect - The article itself isn't notable, but a redirect still helps a reader who searched that topic.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 02:13, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.