Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kasalavu Nesam
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Kasalavu Nesam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's a review of a movie (or, is it a play? Hard to tell.) Might be a candidate for speedy delete, but I don't think it fits in any of the categories. JoelWhy (talk) 12:25, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This was apparently a Tamil television series that aired in the late 1990s or early 2000s.[1] Not completely unsourcable... so I made the article prettier[2] in anticipation that someone better able to research Tamil television might come along and fix it up. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:45, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Sounds good.JoelWhy (talk) 12:10, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Can KEEP but wiki needs at least some verifiable and trusted source. Kindly provide some source to keep it. --Bharathiya 03:16, 31 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bharathiya (talk • contribs)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 23:28, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.