Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalid Jawed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. So Why 07:58, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Khalid Jawed

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per gsearch. No coverage in WP:RS. Fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. Greenbörg (talk) 05:09, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment his books are reviewed in reliable sources such as Dawn here, The Hindu here and the BBC which have some information about him included. Atlantic306 (talk) 15:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:26, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep as his books are reviewed in reliable sources as detailed in my last posting, and they have some information about him Atlantic306 (talk) 11:22, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:10, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is there no Urdu article on him? Seems like it will be impossible to determine how notable this person is without an editor familiar with the languageHyungjoo98 (talk) 03:48, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix (talk) 16:16, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The BBC article, for one, indicates notability and can be easily checked using GTranslator. 84.73.134.206 (talk) 19:15, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per the sources mentioned in Atlantic306's comment. Inter&anthro (talk) 15:51, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.