Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kote anjaneya
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. I'm closing this one based on the nomination rationale. If a better rationale can be found - notability, etc, then perhaps a renomination is appropriate. Let's improve before we delete. SarahStierch (talk) 01:27, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Kote anjaneya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is mostly some kind of legendary story. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:13, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not anymore. And that would be a reason to delete all Category:Mythology. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:43, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment. Not sure what sources there might be outside of English, but this book has at least some discussion of the topic, although I'm not sure if it's sufficient to be "significant coverage". The above recommendation to purge Category:Mythology is a non-starter. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 07:15, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Soft Keep Article needs serious work, but the reason for deletion should be rejected. Neonchameleon (talk) 18:46, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.