Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuzhinapurath Family

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tiptoety ^talk 06:53, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kuzhinapurath Family

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

No evidence of notability for this family. Doug Weller (talk) 14:49, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTE. Verbal chat 14:40, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTE. --Cameron Scott (talk) 14:44, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not a personal database and moreover fails WP:NOTABILITY. Kalivd (talk) 15:20, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTE. --Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 19:01, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The notability is indicated in the discussion page.Simon Cheakkanal (talk) 07:21, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no discussion page. Verbal chat 08:45, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ah, the talk page for the deletion discussion. If there are notable references etc, they should be n the article. The things in the talk page here don't seem to establish notability. Verbal chat 18:40, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Some members of the family are rendering outstanding services to various National and International Agencies such as UN.Wiproman (talk) 07:46, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

— Wiproman (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

- If individuals are notable, they can have their own pages. Verbal chat 08:45, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Quote: "Saviour Kuzhinapurathu, Chief Finance Officer in UN ICTR". No, an accountant within one of many UN commissions does not qualify for automatic inclusion. This is not a public position, it leaves no trace in public record outside UN protocols and self-published sources. Delete. NVO (talk) 15:50, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:NOTE. The information given in talk page cannot be considered as reference. Simynazareth (talk) 18:18, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It was already speedied in February [1]. The contents may be integrated into John Kuzhinapurath. NVO (talk) 19:18, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Enough Kuzhinapurath-related stuff on Wikipedia already (see other AfDs). This is not a personal website. VG ☎ 21:33, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.