Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kylie Sparks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is a consensus that there is not appropriate sourcing to keep this article. Barkeep49 (talk) 17:31, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kylie Sparks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only reference is a broken link. Would file under BLP PROD but there is a reference regardless. Fails GNG since the reference doesn't demonstrate notability either. CatcherStorm talk 08:22, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CatcherStorm talk 08:22, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CatcherStorm talk 08:22, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:05, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:05, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:06, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: As I stated the only reference returns a 404 error. Technically this is an unsourced BLP as such. CatcherStorm talk 05:57, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Sources do exist on the actress, though not terribly good ones. I'll add one so that there is at least one source that works, but I hope others can find better ones. Dflaw4 (talk) 06:58, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:55, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N0nsensical.system(err0r?)(.log) 09:28, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.