Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lakendrick Terrell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lakendrick Terrell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Never played a game in the CFL, fails WP:ATHLETE Delete Ibluffsocall (talk) 14:56, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is about an athlete who fails his sport's notability guidelines. Xajaso (talk) 22:42, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:26, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 10:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep CFL players are notable. MLA (talk) 22:56, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Yes, CFL players are presumed to be notable, however this guy did not play a match in the CFL (or any other fully professional league) and therefore does not meet the sports notabilty guideline. In conjunction, he has received no significant coverage, so doesn't meet the general notability guideline either. Jenks24 (talk) 03:55, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.