Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Passarelli (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 05:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lauren Passarelli

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Her only possible claim to notability is that she was the first woman to graduate Berklee College of Music as a guitar performance major. Being the first woman to graduate with a particular major really is not notable. Sources provided are almost exclusively local or primary. Providing a single quote to CBS News and making a brief appearance on a VH1 special is not notable. She does not meet WP:NACADEMIC or WP:MUSICBIO. Rusf10 (talk) 22:14, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 22:14, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 22:14, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 22:14, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 22:14, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete no real claim to notability except "first women" for a very narrow definition (first women in a particular college in a particular major). No real coverage or academic credentials (neither on JSTOR nor Google Scholar). Pretty clear cut case of failing WP:NPROF. --hroest 01:53, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: first AFD closed as keep, merits further discussion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:50, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The "first x to x" claim could help support WP:BASIC notability if it were covered in independent reliable sources, but I don't see any such sources. (Perhaps that is not surprising, given the narrowness of the claim.) No indication that the subject's band has had the kind of impact that might grant WP:NARTIST notability, nor of WP:NPROF, nor of other notability that I can see. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 13:49, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.