Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leisure (band) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Daniel (talk) 12:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leisure (band)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searching is difficult due to the commonality of the band's name, but can't find enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and they don't meet WP:MUSICBIO. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:56, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:56, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The first Afd is for a different band though. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 17:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- GhostDestroyer100, thanks for the note about the 1st AfD, I meant to mention that, but forgot. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - If this is kept there is a talk page issue that needs to be dealt with. There is content at Talk:LEISURE (band) which was the original name of this version of the article before a move request (still at Talk:LEISURE (band) ) was conducted. If the article is not deleted that stuff needs to be located at Talk:Leisure (band).--65.92.160.124 (talk) 22:56, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This, that, here, there and the article already there are good. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep The sourcing exists--albeit not cited--but is somewhat routine. Yet doesn't the fact the band membership is comprised of individual notable artists make this entity notable? ShelbyMarion (talk) 15:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily due to WP:NOTINHERITED.--65.92.160.124 (talk) 03:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Have added User:Duffbeerforme's refs and the page looks fine to me, certainly passes GNG. Cabrils (talk) 23:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.