Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lieke Van Houten

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:37, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lieke Van Houten

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although the subject of one brief Dutch-language feature, this individual does not meet the "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" standard required for inclusion in Wikipedia. This page has been twice speedy deleted per WP:CSD#A7 and may qualify again. This page may also be the product of the sock farm of an undisclosed paid editor: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rosslinch89. Peacock (talk) 16:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Simply not notable (yet?). duffbeerforme (talk) 12:40, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete far below the notability threshold for models.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:43, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.