Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lissi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The redirect of this page to Lissi und der wilde Kaiser can be re-performed if desired. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:11, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lissi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable web star. Absolutely no secondary or tertiary sources. Zhangj1079 (T|C) 19:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This article doesn't necessarily need to be deleted. It could go back to being a redirect, which was the original revision of the page, before being made into an article. Zhangj1079 (T|C) 19:35, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:51, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:51, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:52, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:54, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the page previously directed to Lissi und der wilde Kaiser, yet as a redirect got practically no hits so could be considered ineffective. Thus, rather than simply redirect back, I figure it makes more sense to delete the article as neither the current content nor the redirect seems to serve any meaningful purpose. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:19, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - though unlike the previous contributor I do think it makes sense to keep the redirect to Lissi und der wilde Kaiser; redirects don't cost us anything. --Doric Loon (talk) 15:02, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.