Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Livingstone Primary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Livingstone Primary School (disambiguation). The Australian article is here, but since i couldn't in any source for the Zambia one, so I didn't made a article for it, if you get any source any source, please make the article using the content here. (non-admin closure) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 12:05, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Livingstone Primary School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is incorrectly about 2 different primary schools. However, there is no reason to split and disambiguate, because neither is notable. Primary schools (unlike high schools) must pass GNG, and there is no evidence that either school does. While the one in Zambia is described as "one of the first in Zambia", that isn't enough. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:31, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Until yesterday (7 October), the article was about the school in Zambia. Things like this happen with primary schools. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ Redirect as non-notable elementary schools, per standard practice. Establishment of a pair of redirects to the appropriate cities or school districts would, of course, be fine. Carrite (talk) 15:34, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'Standard practice' is to redirect to school district or locality. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:35, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. Change made. Carrite (talk) 01:20, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just so that I understand correctly, are you saying that we create a dab page, with the blue link for each line being a link to the city the school is in (I'm pretty sure we don't even know the school districts, much less have a page for them...heck, for all I know, they don't even have school districts in those locales). This would, by the way, be a fine solution for me. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:36, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to a DAB page with links to both localities. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:45, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:25, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We generally redirect rather than delete nn schools, unless they are blatant ads for private institutions. This is an old established precedent, but it's not graven in stone. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:25, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not aware of a suitable redirect target, did you have one in mind? Or are you suggesting creating a disambiguation page? Stuartyeates (talk) 08:53, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.