Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liz George (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:55, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Liz George (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, non-notable JMHamo (talk) 18:04, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 20:11, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 20:11, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 20:11, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:33, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:33, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no real basis of asserting notability for this columnist. Back in 2005, we did not a any real afgree on notability standards leading to anomalous keeps like the first AfD. DGG ( talk ) 07:28, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.