Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loco ninja

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 15:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Loco ninja

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorially toned WP:BLP of a musician, with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC and not enough solid reliable source coverage to support it: there are too many blogs and primary sources, and not enough real media. In addition, the article was created as a draft and then immediately moved by its creator into articlespace without actually submitting it for an WP:AFC review, which is not what the AFC process is for. As always, every musician is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because he exists -- reliable source coverage which supports passage of an NMUSIC criterion is required for an article to become earned, but nothing here is enough. Bearcat (talk) 00:35, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The appropriate or inappropriate use of Articles for Creation is not important. Robert McClenon (talk) 09:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Supported only by unreliable sources. Robert McClenon (talk) 09:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:00, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable musician, failing WP:NMUSIC. DrStrauss talk 17:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - sources and bio edited GxM88 (talk) 04:40, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

— GxM88 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

The only change that has taken place to the sourcing since the time of nomination is the removal of a handful of the most egregious PR/blog content, not the addition of any new sources at all. And the only discernible changes to the bio have involved formatting (i.e. breaking up the wall of text into actual paragraphs), not anything that added any actual new claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. Bearcat (talk) 17:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.