Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. E. Mitchell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 19:55, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

M. E. Mitchell

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Has been in CAT:NN for 12 years; hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn (talk) 18:57, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:16, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:16, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable. Scolaire (talk) 14:20, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If the most we can say about someone is that they wrote a handful of journal papers, sourced to bare citations of those papers, then they're not notable. Searching Google Scholar for "author:me-mitchell lichen" finds a few more papers, but with an h-index of 3 they don't pass WP:PROF#C1 and there is no sign of any other notability criterion. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:PROF and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:19, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.