Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malaaz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:17, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Malaaz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion template deleted by IP. I can't find sources that make this band seem notable, but there may be non-English ones. agtx 23:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 October 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable and self-promotional. IP is likely sock. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:07, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Maybe as their career develops they will become notable, but for now they do not pass WP:GNG or WP:BAND. --MelanieN (talk) 23:47, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as listed sources are all entirely trivial and are nowhere near what is needed as substance, by far nothing close. SwisterTwister talk 00:01, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.