Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mangalorean Catholics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep, given the lack of specificity in the nomination, and the fact that the article is extensively referenced. If concerns about notability still exist, please raise them at Talk:Mangalorean Catholics prior to re-nominating for deletion. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:26, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Mangalorean Catholics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable — Gmx45 (talk) 12:21, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep Well put together and well referenced article about a subject with quite a bit of history. I would be interested to hear the nominator's ideas on why this article fails notability, instead of just a bald "Not notable". Peridon (talk) 14:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Incidentally, the nominator is an SPA, which is perhaps a little out of the ordinary for AfD. Peridon (talk) 14:24, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep per Peridon. The article was missing the AFD template, which I have added. — ækTalk 18:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Is the nomination some sort of a joke?--Sodabottle (talk) 03:25, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Really bad faith nomination. I dont need to say anyting else. --Deepak D'Souza (talk) 04:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Nominator has been banned as a sockpuppet [1]. --Deepak D'Souza (talk) 04:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep: The nominator is a retard. Joyson Konkani 06:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.