Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mann Robinson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that the sourcing present, once filtered for reliability, is insufficient Nosebagbear (talk) 13:55, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mann Robinson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

paid for vanity spam sourced entirely to fake news black hat SEO sources without a single RS. What little other sources exist, which aren't really included here, do not establish notability. Praxidicae (talk) 12:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 14:21, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 14:22, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep page could be rewritten but doesn't seem entirely like spam to me. Balle010 (talk) 15:50, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're not taking into account that literally every single source is paid for spam from black hat SEO sites. If I removed them all, and all the press releases, there would be 0 sources because event pages and listings from local papers that publish anything sent to it also aren't reliable or coverage. It's vanity spam. Praxidicae (talk) 13:40, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — no coverage in reliable sources to substantiate notability. Celestina007 18:49, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we require reliable sources for articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:24, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless better sources are available. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 08:57, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.