Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mano Thutão

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:38, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mano Thutão

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~news search result is not showing anything. Greek Legend (talk) 01:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC)~~ blocked sockpuppet Atlantic306 (talk) 16:42, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 09:05, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 09:05, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ~~Comment~~- There is very little, but there is some information available in Portuguese. This announcement about his death in the local newspaper of Araçatuba, São Paulo is the best that I found. A deceased Brazilian Christian rapper with ~~only one~~ three albums will likely not have many editors digging around to establish notability on enwiki—the article has been deleted a couple times on ptwiki. giso6150 (talk) 12:52, 30 March 2016 (UTC) — I changed this comment to a vote. giso6150 (talk) 12:10, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ptwiki means Portuguese wiki?. Do you have the links? --Greek Legend (talk) 05:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry to abbreviate without linking… the red link on Portuguese Wikipedia for Mano Thutão shows (me) three prior deletions. Administrators may see more information than I do. giso6150 (talk) 12:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:15, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete at best as this is still not satisfying any applicable notability and there will not be anything else considering his death. SwisterTwister talk 05:58, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.