Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Guidoti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G7'd by the creator and deleted by User:Fish and karate. Primefac (talk) 14:43, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Guidoti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable PhD student with no evidence he's made any impact in his field and certainly no sources to support such a claim in the article or elsewhere that I can find. Fails just about every possible encyclopedic standard, including WP:PROF. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:01, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- this looks like a resume.--Rusf10 (talk) 23:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 01:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 01:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 01:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete in no universe is a PhD candidate notable. Clear PROF failure, and PROF is de facto exclusionary. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:40, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete PhD canddiates are never notable for such, and there is no other claim to notability. Even the vast majority of holders of PhDs are not notable. Even being a professor who holds tenure is not enough in and of itself to grant notability. Now if this was cricket, he might be notable, but we have real standards for academics (and should for cricket as well, but that is another story).John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:43, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am not a notable person. I am just a PhD candidate that happens to be an editor-in-chief as well. I am guessing this was created to link with the journal's wiki page. Please, delete. Guidotim (talk) 14:30, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.