Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxx Skytric

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:42, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maxx Skytric

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:MUSIC. While one of his bands may be notable (and I say "may") the other is certainly not, and individual members of a band are only granted articles when they have been part of multiple, notable acts or where they pass the requirements at WP:BIO. Ironholds (talk) 11:42, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insufficient notability, subject fails WP:MUSICBIO. No reliable and independent sources. --Vejvančický (talk) 15:33, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this musician. Joe Chill (talk) 18:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: notability not established with third-party reliable sources. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 01:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 01:26, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm not finding in-depth coverage to suggest this artist meets WP:MUSICBIO. Gongshow ^Talk 04:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I too cannot find any significant coverage to establish notability. Perhaps sometime in the future the band may get more fame to meet our notability requirements. -- œ ^™ 08:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.