Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megha P Rao

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 03:22, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Megha P Rao

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability requirements. No significant sourced material available to be found. Written as promotional material. Habiliment (talk) 09:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:12, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:12, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's all copyvio, so I have added the CSD G12 template. Possibly (talk) 09:40, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Since most of the copyvio had been removed by the time I got to the page, I removed the rest of it. There's now very little left of the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:14, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Being an Indian, never heard of her. Yadav0281 (talk) 07:39, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Above account was less than an hour old when they !voted. Obviously unfamiliar with AfD procedure. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:35, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 13:43, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This really needs no explanation as to why. It is a short and very poorly written article that cites two dead references to a non-notable person. Quite self-explanatory. Coreykai (talk) 14:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.