Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meidata

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:08, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Meidata

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As far as I can tell, this company does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies and organizations. I found some "Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources" but this "is not sufficient to establish notability. " Smart Bomb (talk) 20:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 May 3. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:00, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:27, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Israeli market research firm with US branch. Fairly new - established in 2008. Coverage is mainly limited to research reports released to press. Coverage of the company itself does exist - but is far from enough.Icewhiz (talk) 11:52, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:09, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 16:04, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.