Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meredith Stern

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 22:05, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Meredith Stern

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article comes across as vanity-type with mostly primary and self-published sources. Unclear if any of these establish sufficient notability. Mansheimer (talk) 16:06, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clear keep collections being highlighted in reviews like this one or this one or this one and https://risca.online/2019/02/01/rhode-island-cultural-anchor-meredith-stern/ , and is regularly getting invited by universities and notable gallery showings (i.e. this event, this talk, this talk), Sadads (talk) 13:52, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets GNG per above sourcing. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 14:05, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the multiple reliable sources coverage including independent reviews and other coverage identified in this discussion that shows a clear pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:49, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.